ACP-105 Vs AC-262536 SARM Comparison – Which Is More Effective?

ACP-105 Vs AC-262536

Both ACP-105 and AC-262536 are partial agonists at the androgen receptor, however their anabolic:androgenic ratings are slightly different, with ACP-105 being more favorable with 67% anabolic activity : 21% androgenic activity as opposed to AC-262536 which exerted up to 66% of the anabolic benefits of Testosterone, while simultaneously only exerting 27% as much Androgenic activity.

Based on the statistics and interaction with the androgen receptor there isn’t a significant difference between the two, but ACP-105 seems to be a better choice when putting them head to head.

However, we do not know the binding affinity of ACP-105, while we know that the binding affinity of AC-262536 is Ki of 5nM.

I would still venture to guess that ACP-105 is a better choice for research that is geared towards maximizing anabolic activity with a minimization of potential side effects, however this could only be determined for certain with more data, or more anecdotal comparisons from credible sources.

Detection In Drug Tested Athletes

One thing that should be noted is that supposedly AC-262536 is still undetectable (so I’ve heard), so any drug-tested athlete would hypothetically be able to get a sizeable edge from AC-262536.

However, ACP-105 already is detectable and there has been a doping test designed to detect it.

In Conclusion

I’d say if the research subject wasn’t engaging in tested sports, then ACP-105 would be the preferable choice in terms of sheer anabolic effect relative to potential suppression and side effects (based on the limited data available).

However, if the choice of the SARM used in research was in any way dictated by whether it could be detected or not, then AC-262536 would be the better choice in that particular scenario.

For those that are just here find out where to buy accurately dosed, third party tested SARMs, these are the only companies I currently use for my own personal research:

(Greater Than 99% Purity: FTIR, HPLC, GC-MS, LC-MS & NMR Tested)

Proven Peptides

10% off coupon code “DC10

Chemyo

Narrows Labs

25% off coupon code “DC25

Androbolics Canada (CAD Currency)

Disclaimer: The information included in this article is intended for entertainment and informational purposes only. It is not intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice. By the time you read this, this product(s) might be banned in your country. Be sure to check all laws in your country prior to buying anything to make sure it is compliant where you live with your current government laws.

6 thoughts on “ACP-105 Vs AC-262536 SARM Comparison – Which Is More Effective?”

  1. Hey more plates more dates I wonder if you have ever heard of a company called virilitech selling sarms on ebay. I recently purchased some and was wondering if I’ve wasted my money. Thanks

  2. Does ACP put on size in comparison to LGD 4033 and RAD140? I was thinking of testing ACP with LGD and SR9009. Give me your thoughts.
    Thanks!

    1. I’ve never even tried it so I couldn’t say for certain. My educated guess would be that LGD-4033 would be a much better choice than ACP for size. RAD-140 likely would edge it out as well.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.